Cases 21 - 30 of 971
Waggener van Meter v. Mondelez International, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
Megan Waggener van Meter
Defendant:
Mondelez International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sposato v. Ryan
as 24-536
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SPOSATO
Defendant:
MATTHEW W. RYAN, individually and in his official capacity, PAUL G. CAREY, -, individually and in his official capacity, JED HUDSON, individually and in his official capacity and others
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
Kelly v. Sephora USA, Inc.
as 4:2024cv01648
Plaintiff:
Megan Kelly
Defendant:
Sephora USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Price v. Rover Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Michael Price
Defendant:
Rover Group, Inc., Aaron Easterly, Megan Quinn Siegler and others
Harrison v. Rover Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Michael Harrison
Defendant:
Rover Group, Inc., Aaron Easterly, Megan Quinn Siegler and others
My Fav Electronics, Inc. d/b/a Second Life Mac v. Currie et al
as 1:2024cv01959
Plaintiff:
My Fav Electronics, Inc. d/b/a Second Life Mac
Defendant:
Paula B. Currie and Megan Finnegan Ratliff
Chandler v. DeJoy, et al.
as 24-1265
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. CHANDLER
Defendant:
LOUIS DEJOY, Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service and MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Former Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA v. BRADLEY et al
as 2:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Defendant:
AISHA ASHA BRADLEY, SUMMIT PARK EAST, GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Aisha Bradley
as 24-1357
Petitioner:
In re: AISHA ASHA BRADLEY
Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
