Cases 21 - 30 of 35
DiBenedetto v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as ILS/3:13-cv-50793
Plaintiff:
Nicholas C. DiBenedetto
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
Brumund, Jacobs, Hammel, David v. Nicholas Kefalo
as 12-3721
Debtor - Appellant:
In the Matter of: NICHOLAS C. KEFALOS
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRUMUND, JACOBS, HAMMEL, DAVIDSON & ANDREANO, LLC
Budnick v. Springfield Technical Community College et al
as 3:2012mc93030
Plaintiff:
Thomas P. Budnick
Defendant:
Springfield Technical Community College, Nicholas C. Camerota, W. Masiuk and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02635
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CHAREK et al v. USA
as 1:2012cv00109
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS C. CHAREK , ROSWITHA CHAREK and JESSE CHAREK
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
Manabat v. Collectcorp; et al
as 3:2011cv06204
Plaintiff:
Susan Manabat
Defendant:
Collectcorp and Nicholas C. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
J & J Sports Productions Inc v. Nicholas C Cano et al
as 5:2010cv01881
Defendant:
Nicholas C Cano and Maria D Castillo
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions Inc
Big Top Koolers, Inc. et al v. Circus-Man Snacks, Inc.
as 1:2010mc00256
Plaintiff:
Big Top Koolers, Inc. and Nicholas C. Brienza
Defendant:
Circus-Man Snacks, Inc.
Big Top Koolers, Inc. et al v. Circus-Man Snacks, Inc.
as 1:2010mc00257
Plaintiff:
Big Top Koolers, Inc. and Nicholas C. Brienza
Defendant:
Circus-Man Snacks, Inc.
LAIL et al v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2010cv00210
Plaintiff:
RODNEY LAIL, IRENE SANTACROCE, JAMES B. SPENCER and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, PAUL GARDNER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
