Cases 21 - 30 of 31
LOUISIANA FORESTRY ASSOCIATION INC. et al v. SOLIS et al
as 2:2011cv07687
Plaintiff:
LOUISIANA FORESTRY ASSOCIATION INC. , OUTDOOR AMUSEMENT BUSINESS ASSOCIATION, INC. , CRAWFISH PROCESSORS ALLIANCE and others
Defendant:
HILDA L. SOLIS , JANE OATES , U.S. DEPT. OF LABOR and others
Intervenor_defendant:
COMITE DE APOYO A LOS TRABAJADORES AGRICOLAS , PINEROS Y CAMPESINOS UNIDOS DEL NOROESTE , ALLIANCE OF FOREST WORKERS & HARVESTERS and others
Amicu:
U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
The Louisiana Forestry Association, Inc. et al v. Solis et al
as 1:2011cv01623
Plaintiff:
Louisiana Forestry Association Inc , Outdoor Amusement Business Association Inc , Crawfish Processors Alliance and others
Defendant:
Hilda L Solis , Jane Oates , U S Dept of Labor and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Comite de Apoyo a los Trabajadores Agricolas , Pineros y Campesinos Unidos del Noroeste , Alliance of Forest Workers & Harvesters and others
Amicu:
U S Chamber of Commerce
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
COMITE DE APOYO A LOS TRABAJADORES AGRICOLAS et al v. SOLIS et al
as 2:2009cv00240
Plaintiff:
COMITE DE APOYO A LOS TRABAJADORES AGRICOLAS, PINEROS Y CAMPESINOS UNIDOS DEL NOROESTE, ALLIANCE OF FOREST WORKERS AND HARVESTERS and others
Defendant:
ELAINE L. CHAO, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ALEXANDER J. PASSANTINO and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
United Farm Workers of America v. Edward Hugler
as 09-5009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
United Farm Workers of America, Pineros Y Campesinos Unidos Del Noroeste, Emilio Ruiz and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Edward Charles Hugler, in his official capacity as Acting United States Secretary of Labor, Elaine L. Chao, in her official capacity as United States Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor and others
UNITED FARM WORKERS et al v. CHAO et al
as 1:2009cv00062
Plaintiff:
UNITED FARM WORKERS, PINEROS Y CAMPESINOS UNIDOS DEL NOROESTE, EMILIO RUIZ and others
Defendant:
ELAINE L. CHAO, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, MICHAEL B. CHERTOFF and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
United Farm Workers et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
as 4:2008cv03595
Plaintiff:
United Farm Workers, United Farm Workers, United Farm Workers and others
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
United Farm Workers et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
as 3:2008cv03595
Plaintiff:
United Farm Workers, United Farm Workers, United Farm Workers and others
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency, United States Environmental Protection Agency and United States Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor Dft:
Makhteshim Agan of North America, Inc. and Makhteshim Agan of North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Pesticide Action Network North America et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
as 3:2008cv03542
Plaintiff:
Pesticide Action Network North America, Pesticide Action Network North America, Pesticide Action Network North America and others
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United Farm Workers of America, et al v. Administrator, Environmental P, et al
as 08-35528
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED FARM WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, SEA MAR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER, PINEROS Y CAMPESINOS UNIDOS DEL NOROESTE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ADMINISTRATOR, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee:
GOWAN COMPANY
Amicus Curiae:
SANTA CLARA COUNTY
Service Employees International Union et al v. Chertoff et al
as 3:2007cv01286
Plaintiff:
Service Employees International Union, Service Employees International Union, Service Employees International Union and others
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff and Emilio T. Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
