Cases 21 - 30 of 214
Pacas-Quintanilla v. Garland
as 22-1874
Petitioner:
MAURICIO RAFAEL PACAS-QUINTANILLA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
QUINTANILLA v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 1:2022cv23267
Plaintiff:
HENRY A. QUINTANILLA
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Kristian Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Valladares-Ardon v. Garland
as 22-60366
Petitioner:
Rosa Herminia Valladares-Ardon and Noe Alexander Quintanilla-Valladares
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
United States v. Quintanilla-Dominguez
as 22-1198
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MIGUEL QUINTANILLA-DOMINGUEZ, AKA Luis F. Lopez-Montez, AKA Cesar Rodriguez
Eli Quintanilla v. Department of Corrections Guam, et al
as 22-70111
Petitioner:
ELI CHARFAUROS QUINTANILLA
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS GUAM, ALLEN BORJA, Warden, GUAM PAROLE BOARD, P.O. II and others
Quintanilla-Benitez v. Garland
as 22-60289
Petitioner:
Miguel Angel Quintanilla-Benitez
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Abarca-Quintanilla, et al v. Garland
as 22-9510
Petitioner:
VILMA DEL ROSARIO ABARCA-QUINTANILLA and YULISSA LISBETH ABARCA-ABRACA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Quintanilla-Cruz v. Garland
as 21-60902
Petitioner:
Vanessa Isamar Quintanilla-Cruz, Axel Alessandro Guerrero-Quintanilla and Edgar Alexander Guerrero-Santamaria
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
USA v. Arias-Quintanilla
as 21-51080
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Edwin Yovani Arias-Quintanilla
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
