Cases 21 - 30 of 364
YOUNG v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al
as 1:2021cv02623
Plaintiff:
DR. S. STANLEY YOUNG, S. STANLEY YOUNG and LOUIS ANTHONY COX, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, MICHAEL S. REGAN, SCIENCE ADVISORY BOARD and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Curtis Sheppard, Jr.In re: Curtis Sheppard, Jr.
as 22-11112
Petitioner:
In re: Curtis Lee Sheppard, Jr.
USA v. Ka'Deem Sheppard-Sankey
as 22-13545
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KA'DEEM I. SHEPPARD-SANKEY
Rolleri et al v. Rolleri & Sheppard CPAS, LLP et al
as 3:2022cv01268
Plaintiff:
John M. Rolleri and Ryan C. Sheppard
Defendant:
Rolleri & Sheppard CPAS, LLP and Michael J. Knight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Rosario et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00821
Plaintiff:
Rosario, Anete Rosario, Deanna Rose and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
In re: Waseem Daker
as 22-11983
Petitioner:
In re: WASEEM DAKER
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Mendy et al v. Boxrec et al
as 1:2022cv00535
Plaintiff:
Edward Bissau Mendy, Brendon Denes, Ivana Habazin and others
Defendant:
Boxrec, John Sheppard, Samson Lu and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Groves Incorporated v. R.C. Bremer Marketing Associates Inc et al
as 3:2022cv50154
Plaintiff:
Groves Incorporated
Defendant:
R.C. Bremer Marketing Associates Inc, Joseph Falk, Christopher Soucek and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00741
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sheppard v. Lucas
as 21-40919
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Curtis Lee Sheppard
Defendant / Appellee:
Lucas, Major, Light, Captain, Collins, Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
