Cases 21 - 30 of 1,061
GREEN OCEANS et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al
as 1:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
GREEN OCEANS, RESPONSIBLE OFFSHORE DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE, SAVE RIGHT WHALES COALITION and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEB HAALAND, BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT and others
Petitioner:
SOUTH FORK WIND, LLC and REVOLUTION WIND, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Michael Hill, et al v. DOI, et al
as 24-5011
Plaintiff:
Michael Hill, President, Jason Kills Pretty Enemy, Senator, Alee Birdhat and others
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior, Debra A. Haaland, in her official capacity as United States Secretary of the Interior, Bryan Newland, in his official capacity as Assistant United States Secretary of the Interior for Indian Affairs and others
American Petroleum Institute v. DOI, et al
as 24-1023
Petitioner:
American Petroleum Institute
Respondent:
United States Department of the Interior and Bureau of Ocean Energy Management
Healthy Gulf, et al v. DOI, et al
as 24-1024
Petitioner:
Healthy Gulf, Friends of the Earth, Bayou City Waterkeeper and others
Respondent:
United States Department of the Interior, Debra A. Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management and others
United States of America, et al. v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Eugene, et al.
as 24-684
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRISTY GOLDFUSS, in her official capacity as Director of Council on Environmental Quality, SHAUN DONOVAN, in his official capacity as Director of the Office of Management and Budget and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, EUGENE
Defendant:
STATE OF ALABAMA
Not Classified By Court:
XIUHTEZCATL TONATIUH M., through his Guardian Tamara Roske-Martinez, ALEXANDER LOZNAK, JACOB LEBEL and others
Intervenor:
THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, AMERICAN FUEL & PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Gallatin Wildlife Association et al v. Erickson et al
as 9:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Gallatin Wildlife Association, Native Ecosystems Council and Wildearth Guardians
Defendant:
Mary Erickson, Randy Moore, United States Forest Service and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Morrison County, Minnesota et al v. United States Department of the Interior et al
as 0:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Morrison County, Minnesota, Richardson Township and Leigh Township
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior, Deb Haaland, Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Twin Metals Minnesota LLC, et al v. USA, et al
as 23-5254
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Twin Metals Minnesota LLC and Franconia Minerals (US) LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, United States Department of the Interior, Debra A. Haaland, In her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Center for Biological Diversity, Ely Outfitting Company & Boundary Waters Guide Service, Freeman's Explore, LLC and others
Desert Protection Society v. Haaland, et al.
as 23-4263
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DESERT PROTECTION SOCIETY
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, KAREN MOURITSEN, in her official capacity as State Director of the United States Bureau of Land Management for California, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
EAGLE CREST ENERGY COMPANY, INC.
Village of Hobart WI v. United States Department of The Interior et al
as 1:2023cv01511
Plaintiff:
Village of Hobart WI
Defendant:
United States Department of The Interior, Deb Haaland, Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
