Cases 21 - 30 of 34
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. U.S. SECRET SERVICE
as 1:2013cv00950
Plaintiff:
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.
Defendant:
U.S. SECRET SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. U.S. SECRET SERVICE
as 1:2013cv00647
Plaintiff:
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.
Defendant:
U.S. SECRET SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. U.S. SECRET SERVICE
as 1:2012cv01562
Plaintiff:
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.
Defendant:
U.S. SECRET SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. U.S. AIR FORCE et al
as 1:2012cv00866
Plaintiff:
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.
Defendant:
U.S. AIR FORCE and U.S. SECRET SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Perales v. United States of America et al
as 6:2012cv00520
Defendant:
G. Auerbach, Brian Beckwith, Roy Blunt and others
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Azael Dythian Perales v. Bank of America et al et al
as 8:2012cv00221
Defendant:
All Named in Defendants, Bank of America et al, Opus Bank et al and others
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
TAZEWELL v. HOWARD UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2011cv01196
Plaintiff:
ANTWINE TAZEWELL
Defendant:
HOWARD UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, U.S. SECRET SERVICE, CAPITOL POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (U.S. Secret Service)
as 3:2011cv00588
Plaintiff:
David M. Baker
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security (U.S. Secret Service)
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
In re: Berryhill
as 10-7053
Petitioner:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Respondent:
BRAD HENRY, Governor of Oklahoma, JARI ASKINS, Lieutenant Governor of Oklahoma, W.A. DREW EDMONDSON, Attorney General, Attorney General and others
TAZEWELL v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2010cv00793
Plaintiff:
ANTWINE TAZEWELL
Defendant:
BARACK OBAMA, GEORGE BUSH, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
