Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Makowski v. United Brotherhood of Carpent
as 10-3719
Plaintiff - Appellant: Robert Makowski
Defendant: Ahern Painting Contractors, Incorporated
Defendant - Appellee: United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 157 of District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America and others
NLRB v. Raymond Interior Systems, et al
as 10-72666
Petitioner: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent: RAYMOND INTERIOR SYSTEMS and UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL UNION 1506
Mazza v. District Council For, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2000cv06854
Defendant: District Council For New York and Vincinity, Joiners of America, Anthony Seneca and others
Plaintiff: Thomas Mazza, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
National Labor Relations Board v. Empire State Regional Council
as 10-451
Petitioner: National Labor Relations Board
Respondent: Empire State Regional Council of Carpenters & Affiliate Carpenters Local Union 19, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Employee Benefits Fund et al v. Action Floor Covering Installation, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv14499
Plaintiff: Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund, Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund, Carpenters Pension Trust Fund - Detroit and Vicinity and others
Defendant: Action Floor Covering Installation, Inc., Robert J Kramer and Keith Castrodale
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101 E.R.I.S.A.
The Circle Group, L.L.C. et al v. The Southeastern Carpenters Regional Council of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv03039
Plaintiff: The Circle Group, L.L.C., The Circle Group, L.L.C., Joyce Laidler and others
Defendant: The Southeastern Carpenters Regional Council of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Employee Benefits Fund et al v. Crawford Door Sales, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv13746
Plaintiff: Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund, Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund, Carpenters Pension Trust Fund - Detroit and Vicinity and others
Defendant: Crawford Door Sales, Inc. and William L. Hughes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101 E.R.I.S.A.
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund et al v. Farlow We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv13453
Plaintiff: Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund, Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund, Carpenters Pension Trust Fund - Detroit and Vicinity and others
Defendant: Lori Farlow
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101 E.R.I.S.A.
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Employee Benefits Fund et al v. Gorden Satterla Carpentry, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv13145
Plaintiff: Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Employee Benefits Fund, Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Annuity Fund, Carpenters' Pension Trust Fund - Detroit and Vicinity and others
Defendant: Gorden Satterla Carpentry, Inc. and Gorden Satterla
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101 E.R.I.S.A.
METROPOLITAN ARCHITECTURAL WOODWORK LLC v. NEW YORK BUILDING CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv03836
Plaintiff: METROPOLITAN ARCHITECTURAL WOODWORK LLC
Defendant: NEW YORK BUILDING CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION, UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA, NEW YORK DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?