Cases 21 - 30 of 1,201
US v. Hernandez-Vazquez
as 23-2039
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
EDWIN JAFFET HERNANDEZ-VAZQUEZ
Vazquez v. Garland
as 23-4047
Petitioner:
CARLOS ADRIAN VAZQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Vazquez-Dircio, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3776
Petitioner:
ANA MARIA VAZQUEZ-DIRCIO and IKER JESUS VAZQUEZ-VAZQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
US v. Vazquez-Narvaez
as 23-1963
Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellee:
CARLOS VAZQUEZ-NARVAEZ
Vazquez v. Nielsen, et al.
as 23-3610
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TONETTE VAZQUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Acting Secretary, Department of Homeland Security (Transportation Security Administration), Agency and ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary of Homeland Security (Transportation Security Administration)
Vazquez Torres v. US
as 24-1165
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CESAR R. VAZQUEZ TORRES
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Cruz-Vazquez v. US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) et al
as 3:2023cv01578
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Cruz-Vazquez
Defendant:
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), US Department of Homeland Security, Hon. Alejandro N. Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Roman-Vazquez v. Garland
as 23-3459
Petitioner:
DAVID ROMAN-VAZQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv22206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Pena-Torres, et al v. University of Science, Arts and Tech, et al
as 23-1923
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUJEIL PENA-TORRES, JOSE E. BLASCO-JUSINO, LUCERO RODRIGUEZ-FERNANDEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE, Arts and Tech, a/k/a USAT, a/k/a Medical College of London, a/k/a Malina Medical College, a/k/a Metropolitan Innovative Group, Inc., a/k/a USAT Montserrat LLC, ORIEN L. TULP, CARLA M. KONYK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
