Other Statutes Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 21 - 30 of 152
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00132
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
HYAMS v. KEATING et al
as 2:2020cv01122
Defendant: AEA INVESTORS LP, VINAY KUMAR, AEA INVESTORS PF V LLC and others
Not Classified By Court: EVOQUA WATER TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
Plaintiff: ROBERT HYAMS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00707
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
MARTIN v. NTT DATA, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00686
Respondent: NTT DATA, INC.
Petitioner: SARAH MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
SHAW v. HAYT, HAYT & LANDAU, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00115
Plaintiff: WARREN R. SHAW
Defendant: ROBERT W. CUSICK, ROBERT L. BAROSKA, III, HOSHAU T. MCNAMARA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LOWE v. CSENGE ADVISORY GROUP et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00980
Defendant: AMERICAN GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, PARK AVENUE SECURITIES LLC, RELIASTAR LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff: MARIE B. LOWE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 - Petition for Removal: SEC Act
TORGERSEN v. KEATING et al
as 2:2019cv00410
Defendant: VINAY KUMAR, EVOQUA WATER TECHNOLOGIES CORP., PETER M. WILVER and others
Plaintiff: DALLAS TORGERSEN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01361
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv01196
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
PERRONG v. SELLTEL INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00191
Defendant: DAVID CARY GARTENBERG, DOES 1 THROUGH 100, SELLTEL INC. and others
Plaintiff: ANDREW R. PERRONG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?