Cases 31 - 40 of 74
National Wildlife Federation, et al v. NMFS, et al
as 17-35466
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, IDAHO WILDLIFE FEDERATION, WASHINGTON WILDLIFE FEDERATION and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON
Defendant:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, U.S. ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
Intervenor-Defendant:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF IDAHO and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant:
INLAND PORTS AND NAVIGATION GROUP
National Wildlife Federation, et al v. NMFS, et al
as 17-35462
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, IDAHO WILDLIFE FEDERATION, WASHINGTON WILDLIFE FEDERATION and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON
Defendant - Appellant:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, U.S. ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
Intervenor-Defendant:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF IDAHO and others
Los Angeles Waterkeeper et al v. Pruitt et al
as 2:2017cv03454
Plaintiff:
American Rivers, Los Angeles Waterkeeper and Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
Defendant:
Scott Pruitt, Alexis Strauss and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Blue Water Baltimore, Inc. et al v. Pruitt et al
as 1:2017cv01253
Defendant:
Scott Pruitt , Cecil A. Rodrigues and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Plaintiff:
Blue Water Baltimore, Inc. , Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. and American Rivers
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. ยง 1365
Blue Water Baltimore, Inc. v. Scott Pruitt
as 17-1258
Petitioner:
BLUE WATER BALTIMORE, INC., NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INCORPORATED and AMERICAN RIVERS
Respondent:
SCOTT PRUITT, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, CECIL ANTHONY RODRIGUES, in his official capacity as Acting Regional Administrator for Region III of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Los Angeles Waterkeeper, et al v. Scott Pruitt, et al
as 17-70570
Petitioner:
LOS ANGELES WATERKEEPER, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. and AMERICAN RIVERS
Respondent:
SCOTT PRUITT, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, ALEXIS STRAUSS, in her official capacity as Acting Regional Administrator for Region IX of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
American Rivers, et al v. FERC, et al
as 16-1336
Petitioner:
American Rivers and Alabama Rivers Alliance
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and United States Secretary of the Interior
National Wildlife Federation, et al v. NMFS, et al
as 16-35761
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, IDAHO WILDLIFE FEDERATION, WASHINGTON WILDLIFE FEDERATION and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, U.S. ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS and U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellant:
STATE OF OREGON
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF IDAHO and others
National Wildlife Federation, et al v. NMFS, et al
as 16-35759
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, IDAHO WILDLIFE FEDERATION, WASHINGTON WILDLIFE FEDERATION and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff:
STATE OF OREGON
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, U.S. ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS and U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF IDAHO and others
National Wildlife Federation, et al v. NMFS, et al
as 16-35752
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, IDAHO WILDLIFE FEDERATION, WASHINGTON WILDLIFE FEDERATION and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON
Defendant:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, U.S. ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS and U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
Intervenor-Defendant:
STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF IDAHO, KOOTENAI TRIBE OF IDAHO and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
