Cases 31 - 40 of 93
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02763
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Coates v. Valeo Financial Advisors LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00574
Defendant:
Pamela K Koehler, Judge Nancy H Vaidik, Judge Edward W Najam, Jr and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Coates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
IMO 2018 Attorney Mass Suspension
as 1:2018mc00026
In Re:
Lauren Kathleen Griffin, Michael John Bellich, Thomas William Belleperche and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
as 1:2018mc00038
Respondent:
ANDREW JOHN ALBRIGHT, MICHAEL EUGENE ALLEN, MANISH SHAILESHKUMAR ANTANI and others
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
LARDIZABAL v. ANDREWS AND COX, P.C et al
as 2:2018cv00072
Defendant:
AMERICAN ACCEPTANCE CO., LLC, and ANDREWS AND COX, P.C
Plaintiff:
JOSE LARDIZABAL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
CAVIUM, INC. v. IN RE: SUBPOENA TO CROWN POINT TRANSACTIONS LLC AND ANDREW HEIN IN CONNECTION WITH: ALACRITECH, INC.
as 1:2017mc00070
Plaintiff:
CAVIUM, INC.
Defendant:
IN RE: SUBPOENA TO CROWN POINT TRANSACTIONS LLC AND ANDREW HEIN IN CONNECTION WITH: ALACRITECH, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
