Cases 31 - 40 of 1,107
Rodriguez-Lopez v. Colon
as 3:2024cv01025
Petitioner:
Juan M Febres, Alexis Rodriguez-Lopez and Juan M. Febres
Respondent:
Rey Colon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Simon Tusha, et al v. James Richmond, et al
as 24-10073
Plaintiff:
SIMON TUSHA and TIDE, LLC
Defendant:
JAMES RICHMOND, JEANNE RICHMOND, IEPRENEUR, LLC and others
America Aguilar et al v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 2:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
America Aguilar, Alexis Bell, Dina Ward and others
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association, U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc. and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Millet (Roman)
as 24-18
Defendant:
RICHARD MORALES, HECTOR LUIS RIOS, MARIA VIDRO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MANUEL E. ROMAN, Manny and Pito
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
COLLINS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00003
Petitioner:
ALEXIS COLLINS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
United States of America v. Colato-Gallardo
as 23-4445
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
NELSON ALEXIS COLATO-GALLARDO
Rodriguez-Sorto v. Garland
as 23-4339
Petitioner:
ALEXIS RODRIGUEZ-SORTO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Calderon-Lopez De Rodriguez, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4151
Petitioner:
DARLIN XIOMARA CALDERON-LOPEZ DE RODRIGUEZ, JEFERSON LEONEL RODRIGUEZ-CALDERON and DILAND ALEXIS RODRIGUEZ-CALDERON
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
