Cases 31 - 40 of 2,694
Cheng v. United States of America
as 24-1131
Plaintiff:
SHENG-WEN CHENG, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, C.O. ANDRE HICKSON, Warden JEAN RENE and others
Thompson v. City of New York
as 24-1051
Plaintiff:
EON THOMPSON
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, BILL DE BLASIO, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Mayor of New York City, CYNTHIA BRANN, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Commissioner of Correction and others
Chepilko v. Henry
as 24-1059
Petitioner:
SERGEI CHEPILKO
Defendant:
Police Officer SCOTT HENRY, THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Sergeant TARAKUR CHOWDHURY and others
Harris v. The City of New York
as 24-1004
Plaintiff:
ISHMAEL C. HARRIS, YUSUF A. HARRIS, GREGORY S. HARRIS and others
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, ANDREW DIETZ, New York City Police Department Detective and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Knight v. City of New York
as 24-982
Plaintiff:
CAVALIER D. KNIGHT
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK and EDWARD A. CABAN
City of Buffalo, et al. v. Hyundai Motor America, Inc., et al.
as 24-2350
Plaintiff:
CITY OF CINCINNATI, CITY OF CLEVELAND, CITY OF SEATTLE and others
Defendant:
HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA, INC. and KIA MOTOR AMERICA, INC
Manko v. Lenox Hill Hospital
as 24-954
Plaintiff:
NELLA MANKO
Defendant:
LENOX HILL HOSPITAL, DANA A. MANNOR, M.D., NEW YORK STATE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM and others
Wynne Transportation LLC v. City of New York
as 1:2024cv01062
Plaintiff:
Wynne Transportation LLC
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cm Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Taylor v. The City of New York
as 24-915
Plaintiff:
NAKIA TAYLOR
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Lieutenant CHRISTOPHER SIANI, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
