Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Lahasky v. United States of America et al
as 2:2010mc00440
Petitioner:
Ephram M. Lahasky
Respondent:
Douglas Shulman, Neena I. Singh and United States of America
North American Communications, Inc. et al v. United States of America et al
as 4:2010mc00056
Petitioner:
North American Communications, Inc. , Michael Herman , Robert Paltrow and others
Respondent:
United States of America, Douglas Shulman and Pebble A. Bulvin-Albertelli
Glenn Winningham v. Douglas Shulman, et al
as 10-5039
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Glenn Winningham
Defendant - Appellee:
Douglas Shulman, Mark Everson, Dennis Parizek and others
Cote v. Shulman
as 10-1051
Petitioner - Appellant:
DIANA COTE
Respondent - Appellee:
DOUGLAS SHULMAN, Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
WINNINGHAM v. SHULMAN et al
as 1:2009cv02435
Defendant:
DOUGLAS SHULMAN, MARK EVERSON, DENNIS PARIZEK and others
Plaintiff:
GLEN WINNINGHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lahasky v. United States of America et al
as 2:2009mc00688
Plaintiff:
Ephram M. Lahasky
Defendant:
United States of America, Douglas Shulman and Neena I. Singh
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Type:
Other Statutes
Charania, et al v. Shulman
as 09-2430
Petitioner - Appellant:
NOORDIN M. CHARANIA, FARHANA CHARANIA, Administrator, MEHRAN CHARANIA, Administrator and others
Respondent - Appellee:
DOUGLAS SHULMAN, Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Huntress v. Shulman
as 09-2294
Petitioner - Appellant:
GARY E. HUNTRESS
Respondent - Appellee:
DOUGLAS SHULMAN, Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
BRYANT et al v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2009cv01637
Plaintiff:
ERIC BRYANT and JOAN BRYANT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, DOUGLAS SHULMAN, DENNIS L. PARIZEK and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
MARCIANO v. SHULMAN
as 1:2009cv01499
Plaintiff:
GEORGES MARCIANO
Defendant:
DOUGLAS SHULMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
