Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Yassin Aref, et al v. Loretta Lynch, et al
as 15-5154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Yassin Muhiddin Aref, Kifah Jayyousi and Daniel McGowan
Defendant - Appellee:
Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General of the United States, Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Director, Federal Bureau of Prisoners, D. Scott Dodrill, Assistant Director, Correctional Programs Division and others
AL KASSAR v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2015cv00714
Plaintiff:
MONZER AL KASSAR
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. and D. SCOTT DODRILL
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Mikeal Stine v. Charles Samuels, Jr.
as 15-5062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant - Appellee:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons
Del Rio v. Obama et al
as 4:2014mc02992
Petitioner:
Victor Del Rio and N Del Rio
Respondent:
Barack Obama, Eric Holder, James Cole and others
Del Rio v. Obama et al
as 4:2014mc02943
Plaintiff:
N. Del Rio
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Eric Holder, James Cole and others
HAMPTON v. COMEY et al
as 1:2014cv01641
Plaintiff:
JEROME HAMPTON
Defendant:
JAMES B. COMEY, ANNE MARY CARTER, TIMOTHY J. ERVIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Stephen Yagman v. Cornell Companies Inc et al
as 2:2014cv07555
Defendant:
Sarah Marie Schuh, Kevin Louis Kincey, Wes J. Mayhew and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Yagman
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HAMPTON V. COMEY, ET AL.
as 1:2014cv01607
Plaintiff:
JEROME HAMPTON
Defendant:
JAMES B. COMEY, ANNE MARY CARTER, TIMOTHY J. ERVIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SCHOTZ v. SAMUELS
as 1:2013cv01811
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR.
Plaintiff:
BARRY R. SCHOTZ
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
In re: Trevor Benjamin
as 13-4146
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: TREVOR BENJAMIN
Defendant - Respondent:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, WARDEN ALLENWOOD and ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
JAMES M. MUNLEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
