Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 66
HARKIN v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv03794
Plaintiff: DANIEL ANTHONY HARKIN
Defendant: TRANS UNION, LLC and ALLIANCE ONE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
In Re: Christopher A. Harkins, Esq.
as 1:2012mc00189
Respondent: Christopher A. Harkins
Cause Of Action: Disciplinary Proceedings
Swords v. Mulva et al
as 1:2011cv01250
Plaintiff: Patricia Swords
Defendant: James J. Mulva, Kenneth M. Duberstein, Ruth R. Harkin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, et al v. Pfizer, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-2096
Plaintiff - Appellee: KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN and KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITAL
Plaintiff: CHARLES HAYNES, JR., BETTIE A NEWSON, ANDREW SMITH and others
Defendant - Appellant: PFIZER, INC. and WARNER-LAMBERT CO.
Petitioner: HAROLD SPRINKLE, RICHARD W DODD and CHRISTINE MANFREDI
Defendant: CLINE DAVIS & MANN INC, MARY LOU LIENERTH, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, ECKERD CORPORATION and others
: CAROL JANNEY and DARREN MANCUSO
Intervenor: MARK DUDLEY, SUSAN DUDLEY, RHONDA GAYLE GOODRIDGE and others
Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, et al v. Pfizer, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1904
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES HAYNES, JR., BETTIE A NEWSON, ANDREW SMITH and others
Defendant - Appellee: PFIZER, INC.
Plaintiff: SHIRLEY DOLGOFF, TERESA E TEATER, BRENDA STRADDECK and others
Petitioner: HAROLD SPRINKLE, RICHARD W DODD and CHRISTINE MANFREDI
Defendant: CLINE DAVIS & MANN INC, MARY LOU LIENERTH, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, ECKERD CORPORATION and others
: CAROL JANNEY and DARREN MANCUSO
Intervenor: MARK DUDLEY, SUSAN DUDLEY, RHONDA GAYLE GOODRIDGE and others
Harden Manufacturing Co., et al v. Pfizer, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1806
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES HAYNES, JR., BETTIE A NEWSON, ANDREW SMITH and others
Defendant - Appellee: PFIZER, INC.
Plaintiff: SHIRLEY DOLGOFF, TERESA E TEATER, BRENDA STRADDECK and others
Petitioner: HAROLD SPRINKLE, RICHARD W DODD and CHRISTINE MANFREDI
Defendant: CLINE DAVIS & MANN INC, MARY LOU LIENERTH, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, ECKERD CORPORATION and others
: CAROL JANNEY and DARREN MANCUSO
Intervenor: MARK DUDLEY, SUSAN DUDLEY, RHONDA GAYLE GOODRIDGE and others
Aetna, Inc. v. Pfizer, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1595
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES HAYNES, JR., BETTIE A NEWSON, ANDREW SMITH and others
Defendant - Appellee: PFIZER, INC.
Plaintiff: SHIRLEY DOLGOFF, TERESA E TEATER, BRENDA STRADDECK and others
Petitioner: HAROLD SPRINKLE, RICHARD W DODD and CHRISTINE MANFREDI
Defendant: CLINE DAVIS & MANN INC, MARY LOU LIENERTH, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, ECKERD CORPORATION and others
: CAROL JANNEY and DARREN MANCUSO
Intervenor: MARK DUDLEY, SUSAN DUDLEY, RHONDA GAYLE GOODRIDGE and others
Haynes, et al v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 11-1516
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES HAYNES, JR., BETTIE A NEWSON, ANDREW SMITH and others
Defendant - Appellee: PFIZER, INC.
Plaintiff: SHIRLEY DOLGOFF, TERESA E TEATER, BRENDA STRADDECK and others
Petitioner: HAROLD SPRINKLE, RICHARD W DODD and CHRISTINE MANFREDI
Defendant: CLINE DAVIS & MANN INC, MARY LOU LIENERTH, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, ECKERD CORPORATION and others
: CAROL JANNEY and DARREN MANCUSO
Intervenor: MARK DUDLEY, SUSAN DUDLEY, RHONDA GAYLE GOODRIDGE and others
Freedman v. Mulva et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00686
Plaintiff: Robert Freedman
Defendant: James J. Mulva , Kenneth M. Duberstein , Ruth R. Harkin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Sarah Underwood v. Rita Harkins, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-13117
Plaintiff - Appellant: SARAH JANE UNDERWOOD
Defendant - Appellee: RITA HARKINS and LUMPKIN COUNTY, GEORGIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?