Cases 31 - 40 of 358
Doe v. Varsity Brands, LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00430
Plaintiff:
John Doe and John Doe 1
Defendant:
Varsity Brands, LLC, Varsity Spirit, LLC, Varsity Brands Holding Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Shook et al v. NCG Acquisition, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00065
Defendant:
NCG CARE, Inc., NCG Acquisition, LLC doing business as Appalachian Community Services and ncgCARE
Plaintiff:
Kim Shook, Kylie Scolaro-Conti and John Szwyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Suleta et al v. Citibank, N.A. et al
as 5:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
Alejandro J. Suleta and Adrianne Carroll
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Find.com URL Holding, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2021cv00559
Plaintiff:
Find.com URL Holding, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Geiger et al v. Ambis 1 Night Club Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00415
Plaintiff:
Brenda Geiger, Camila Davalos, Carissa Rosario and others
Defendant:
Ambis 1 Night Club Inc., Ronnie Woodall and Ambis 1 Night Club Inc. d/b/a Ambis 1 Night Club
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Wiles v. Grossman et al
as 1:2021cv00774
Petitioner:
STEVEN A. GROSSMAN, BLACK & BOONE, P.A. and Lucas T. Baker
Respondent:
JOHN LEE WILES
WILES v. GROSSMAN et al
as 1:2021mc00033
Petitioner:
STEVEN A. GROSSMAN, BLACK & BOONE, P.A. and Lucas T. Baker
Respondent:
JOHN LEE WILES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
