Cases 31 - 40 of 71
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Shanley v. O'Prey et al
as 3:2014cv01929
Plaintiff:
William Brandon Shanley
Defendant:
Kevin O'Prey, John Miller, Deborah Turness and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
In re: Kenneth Mitan, et al
as 14-3207
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: KENNETH MITAN, also known as John Hill also known as Police Officer, Sgt. John Miller also known as John Thompson also known as John Adams
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nominal Respondent:
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON
USA v. Kenneth Mitan
as 14-3104
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KENNETH MITAN, also known as John Hill also known as Police Officer, Sgt. John Miller also known as John Thompson also known as John Adams
United States of America v. Miller (Cari)
as 14-424
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jason Zullo, Dennis Spaulding and John Miller
Defendant - Appellant:
David Cari
United States of America v. Miller (Spaulding)
as 14-420
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
John Miller, David Cari and Jason Zullo
Defendant - Appellant:
Dennis Spaulding
United States of America v. Miller (Zullo)
as 13-3969
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
John Miller, David Cari and Dennis Spaulding
Defendant - Appellant:
Jason Zullo
Martin et al v. Bank of America N.A. et al
as 1:2013cv02350
Plaintiff:
John Miller, Karen Holloway, Gerald Beamon and others
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., BMO Harris Bank, N.A., OneWest Bank, FSB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv11160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miller v. ASSET ACCEPTANCE, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv15441
Plaintiff:
John Miller
Defendant:
ASSET ACCEPTANCE, LLC and DOE 1-5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
