Cases 31 - 40 of 260
Spiteri v. Branson et al
as 1:2022cv00933
Plaintiff:
Thomas Spiteri
Defendant:
Richard Branson, Chamath Palihapitiya, Michael Moses and others
Petitioner:
Cody Laidlaw
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Lisa Grenier
Bayshore Capital Advisors, LLC et al v. Bron Studios USA, Inc. et al
as 7:2022cv01105
Plaintiff:
Bayshore Capital Advisors, LLC, BCA Alternative Income Fund, LP and Rocking T Ranch, LLLP
Defendant:
Creative Wealth Media Finance Corp., BRON Creative Corp., BRON Creative USA Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
USA v. Tizzano
as 22-20051
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jonas Tizzano
Plumley v. Veoneer, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01708
Plaintiff:
Patrick Plumley
Defendant:
Veoneer, Inc., Robert W. Alspaugh, Jan Carlson and others
Eric Sabatini v. Veoneer, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv09292
Plaintiff:
Eric Sabatini
Defendant:
Veoneer, Inc., Robert W. Alspaugh, Jan Carlson and others
CHERRY HILL PROGRAMS, INC. et al v. SULLIVAN
as 1:2021cv20248
Plaintiff:
CHERRY HILL PROGRAMS, INC. and CHERRY HILL ACQUISITION HOLDINGS, INC.
Defendant:
JONAS SULLIVAN
Saint Armand et al v. Secretary, Department of Homeland Security et al
as 6:2021cv01985
Plaintiff:
Marie A. Saint Armand and Jonas Claudius
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
JUSTICE, II v. VEONEER, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv05193
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY D JUSTICE, II
Defendant:
VEONEER, INC., JAN CARLSON, ROBERT W ALSPAUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Amodwala v. Veoneer, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06240
Plaintiff:
Alkesh Amodwala
Defendant:
Veoneer, Inc., Jan Carlson, Robert W. Alspaugh and others
Whitfield v. Veoneer, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv09177
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Veoneer, Inc., Jan Carlson, Robert W. Alspaugh and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
