Cases 31 - 40 of 92
Rousso v. King County et al
as 2:2018cv01080
Defendant:
Patrick Hinds, King County, John Does 1-100 and others
Plaintiff:
Lee Rousso
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
King County v. Azar et al
as 2:2018cv00242
Plaintiff:
King County
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar, II and U.S. Department of Human and Health Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
United States of America v. Britt et al
as 2:2017mc00140
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Billy Morris Britt
Garnishee:
King County Central Payroll Operations
King County v. City of Sammamish
as 2:2017cv00921
Plaintiff:
King County
Defendant:
City of Sammamish
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Rabang et al v. Kelly et al
as 2:2017cv00088
Plaintiff:
Margretty Rabang , Olive Oshiro , Dominador Aure and others
Defendant:
Robert Kelly, Jr, Rick D George, Agripina Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
United States of America v. Murphy et al
as 2:2016mc00108
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Douglas E Murphy
Garnishee:
Christ the King Community Church
Khazali v. King County Court of the Washington State
as 2:2016cv01021
Plaintiff:
Masoud Khazali
Defendant:
King County Court of the Washington State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Hunter Wise Commodities LLC et al
as 2:2016mc00107
Plaintiff:
United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Defendant:
Hunter Wise Commodities LLC, Hunter Wise Services LLC, Hunter Wise Credit LLC and others
Receiver:
Melanie E Damian
United States of America v. Cunningham et al
as 2:2016mc00052
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Charles D. Cunningham
Garnishee:
King County Payroll
Sno-King Watershed Council et al v. Snohomish County
as 2:2016cv00318
Plaintiff:
Sno-King Watershed Council and Waste Action Project
Defendant:
Snohomish County
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
