Cases 31 - 40 of 5,188
King v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, et al.
as 24-4034
Plaintiff:
STACEY KING
Defendant:
LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, ALEJANDRA ZAMBRANO, LARRY HADFIELD and others
PETERSON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv01006
Petitioner:
MADELEINE KING PETERSON
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
David Jaroslawicz, et al v. M&T Bank Corp, et al
as 24-8025
Petitioner:
BELINA FAMILY and JEFF KRUBLIT
Respondent:
M&T BANK CORP, HUDSON CITY BANCORP INC, RENE F. JONES and others
Kanealii v. Saito, et al.
as 24-3890
Plaintiff:
NOA KANEALII, IO PONO I KELII UA MAU
Defendant:
TYLER C. SAITO, MICHAEL SOONG, STATE OF HAWAII and others
David Jaroslawicz, et al v. M&T Bank Corp, et al
as 24-8024
Petitioner:
BELINA FAMILY and JEFF KRUBLIT
Respondent:
M&T BANK CORP, HUDSON CITY BANCORP INC, ROBERT G. WILMERS and others
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Sripetch, et al.
as 24-3830
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
ONGKARUCK SRIPETCH, AMANDA FLORES, BREHNEN KNIGHT and others
Stourbridge Investments LLC v. Gelsinger et al
as 1:2024cv00734
Defendant:
Gregory D. Smith, Intel Corporation, James J. Goetz and others
Plaintiff:
Stourbridge Investments LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Benshoof v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Seattle
as 24-3765
Petitioner:
KURT BENSHOOF
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Interested Party:
SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, A.R.W., by and through his father Kurt Benshoof, NATHAN CLIBER and others
ALI v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv01722
Defendant:
MATTHEW PALMER, JAMES APPLEGATE, PHILIP T. REEKER and others
Plaintiff:
JALIL ALI
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
