Cases 31 - 40 of 1,571
McDonald v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as LAW/2:23-CV-01704
Plaintiff:
McDonald and Ashleigh McDonald
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk North America Operations A/S, Novo Nordisk U S Holdings Inc and others
McDonald v. Shinn, et al.
as 23-3619
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONALD DEWAYNE MCDONALD
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, DIRECTOR, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION, AND REENTRY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Shari Oliver, et al v. Julie McDonald, et al
as 23-2007
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHARI LYNN OLIVER, M.A.O. and M.L.O.
Defendant / Appellee:
JULIE A. MCDONALD, MATTHEW W. OLIVER, PHILIP G. VERA and others
Thomson v. McDonalds
as 1:2023cv00725
Plaintiff:
Meka Thomson
Defendant:
McDonalds
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 3410 Right to Financial Privacy Act
USA v. Frank McDonald, Jr.
as 23-13466
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
FRANK MCDONALD, JR.
McDonaldIn re: McDonald
as 24-1015
Appellant:
In re: JAROM MCDONALD, THERON BRENT HARMON, JEFFREY HARMON and others
Appellee:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Iyanna Anderson v. Seat Pleasant Police Department
as 23-1981
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IYANNA ANDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
SEAT PLEASANT POLICE DEPARTMENT, STATE OF MARYLAND, Attorney General, LIEUTENANT HEYWARD, (0159) and others
FloydIn re: Floyd
as 23-2395
Appellant:
In re: BONNIE IRIS MCDONALD FLOYD
Appellee:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
