Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Korn et al
as 4:2010cv02327
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Nancy S. Korn and Brams Beverage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
In Re: Nancy S.Tierney
as 1:2010adr00008
Other:
American Bar Association, US Bankruptcy Court - NH, Clerk and US Court of Appeals-First Circuit, Clerk
Respondent:
Nancy S. Tierney
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Korn et al
as 4:2010cv00331
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Nancy S. Korn and BRAMS BEVERAGE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Violation of Illegal Interception of Cable System
BERENT v. USA
as 1:2009cv00721
Sokolowski v. McGillicuddy III et al
as 1:2009cv06063
Plaintiff:
W.A. Sokolowski
Defendant:
Conrnelius Alexander McGillicuddy III, Raymond W. McDaniel, Jr., Basil L. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Mannix v. Madigan et al
as 1:2009cv00103
Plaintiff:
Sheila A. Mannix
Defendant:
Lisa Madigan, Richard A. Devine, Michael J. Waller and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. Citizens Communications Compan
as 08-1930
Plaintiff:
BANGOR, ME
Defendant - Appellee:
CITIZENS COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Defendant:
MAINE CENTRAL RAILROAD CO., STATE OF ME, BARRETT PAVING MATERIALS INC. and others
Movant - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Riches v. Citizens Communications Compan
as 08-1930
Plaintiff:
BANGOR, ME
Defendant / Appellee:
CITIZENS COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Defendant:
MAINE CENTRAL RAILROAD CO., STATE OF MAINE, BARRETT PAVING MATERIALS, INC. and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
