Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00777
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv09875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
USA v. Eliud Pequeno
as 14-40451
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ELIUD REYMUNDO PEQUENO
USA v. Reymundo Ovalle-Sandoval
as 14-40323
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
REYMUNDO OVALLE-SANDOVAL
J & J Sports Productions Incorporated v. Loza et al
as 2:2013cv00931
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions Incorporated
Defendant:
Agustin Loza and Reymundo Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Communications Act of 1934
Reymundo Mendoza, et al v. Seth Harris, et al
as 13-5118
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Reymundo Zacarias Mendoza, Francisco Javier Castro and Sergio Velasquez Catalan
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Alfredo Conovilca Matamoros
Defendant - Appellee:
Seth D. Harris, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the United States Department of Labor and United States Department of Labor
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Western Range Association and Mountain Plains Agriculture Service
David v. Holder
as 13-828
Petitioner:
Jose Monio David, AKA Reymundo Martinez, AKA Raymundo G. Martinez, AKA Raymundo Chimillo, AKA Raymundo Bulnes, AKA Raymundo Guzman, AKA Raymundo Rivas, AKA Reynando Martinez, AKA Reymundo G. Martinez, AKA Jose Mario David, AKA Jose David, AKA Jose M. Davi
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
USA v. Rudy Mendoza
as 12-14634
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RUDY REYMUNDO MENDOZA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
