Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Dr. Marshall J. Orloff ORA R/O, et al v. Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP, et al
as 13-4327
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DR. MARSHALL J ORLOFF and ORLOFF FAMILY TRUST DTD 12/13/01
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STICHTING PENSIOENFONDS ABP, INTERNATIONAL FUND MANAGEMENT SA, JACKSONVILLE POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MERCK & CO INC, RICHARD T. CLARK, MERCK SCHERING PLOUGH PHARMACEUTICALS and others
In Re: Merck & Co.
as 13-4253
Appellant:
FRANKLIN DEJULIUS
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STICHTING PENSIOENFONDS ABP, INTERNATIONAL FUND MANAGEMENT SA, JACKSONVILLE POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MERCK & CO INC, RICHARD T. CLARK, MERCK SCHERING PLOUGH PHARMACEUTICALS and others
CLARK, et al v ZIMMER, INC., et al
as NJ/2:13-cv-02742
Plaintiff:
DONNA M. CLARK and JOHN T. CLARK
Defendant:
ZIMMER, INC. , ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. and ZIMMER ORTHOPAEDIC SURGICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
Terry Rex v. Timbar Packing & Display
as 12-4147
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY REX
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMBAR PACKING & DISPLAY
Third Party - Appellee:
DIANE T. CLARKE, DPM and KEYSTONE PODIATRIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, P.C.
In Re: Merck & Co., Inc.
as 12-8097
Plaintiff - Respondent:
STICHTING PENSIOENFONDS ABP, INTERNATIONAL FUND MANAGEMENT SA, JACKSONVILLE POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
MERCK & CO INC
Defendant - Respondent:
RICHARD T. CLARK, MERCK SCHERING-PLOUGH PHARMACEUTICALS, PETER S. KIM and others
US v. Orlandus Clark
as 11-5183
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ORLANDUS T. CLARK, a/k/a Trap
Andexler v. Clarke
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2010cv01019
Plaintiff:
Michelle Andexler
Defendant:
Michael T. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.