Cases 31 - 40 of 42
US POSTAL SERVICE EXPRESS MAIL PARCEL WITH DELIVERY CONFIRMATION NUMBER EG594971399US
as 2:2010mj02862
Defendant:
US POSTAL SERVICE EXPRESS MAIL PARCEL WITH DELIVERY CONFIRMATION NUMBER EG594971399US (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
USA v. US POSTAL SERVICE EXPRESS MAIL PARCEL WITH DELIVERY CONFIRMATION NUMBER EG594971399US
as 2:2010mj02862
Defendant:
US POSTAL SERVICE EXPRESS MAIL PARCEL WITH DELIVERY CONFIRMATION NUMBER EG594971399US (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
MCKEEMAN v. US POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2010cv01466
Plaintiff:
RITA MORRIS MCKEEMAN
Defendant:
US POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIRMA v. US POSTAL SERVICES
as 1:2010cv00999
Plaintiff:
KEDIST GIRMA
Defendant:
US POSTAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
21st Century Insurance Company v. US Postal Service et al
as 2:2009cv06614
Plaintiff:
21st Century Insurance Company
Defendant:
US Postal Service and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Thomas Wright v. Postmaster General of the Unit
as 08-4685
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS J. WRIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
POSTMASTER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, Post Master General of the US Postal Service
NLRB v. US Postal Service
as 08-3274
Not Party - Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Not Party - Respondent:
US POSTAL SERVICE
Hammond v. US Postal Service
as 1:2007cv00268
Plaintiff:
Michael Hammond
Defendant:
US Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Kady v. Haus, et al
as 4:2007cv01658
Defendant:
US Postal Service, Matthew P. Haus, John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Diana L. Kady
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
State of New Hampshire v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv00080
Plaintiff:
State of New Hampshire
Defendant:
ExxonMobil Corporation, Cumberland Farms, Inc., FirstGroup America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land (CERCLA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
