Cases 31 - 40 of 365
Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc., et al v. Merrick B. Garland, et al
as 23-3230
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc., State of West Virginia, State of North Dakota and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick B. Garland, in his Official Capacity, as Attorney General of the United States, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, The and Steven Dettelbach, in his Official Capacity, as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Appellant:
Members of Congress
State of Iowa et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
as 4:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
State of Iowa, Attorney General, State of Nebraska and State of Iowa
Defendant:
Environmental Protection Agency and United States Environmental Protection Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7545 Air Pollution Prevention - Regulation of Fuels
State of Missouri v. Biden
as 23-30445
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Missouri, State of Louisiana, Aaron Kheriaty and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Vivek H. Murthy, Xavier Becerra and others
Amicus Curiae:
Children's Health Defense, Leland Stanford Junior University, Electronic Frontier Foundation and others
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 23-2411
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of West Virginia, State of North Dakota, State of Georgia and others
Not Yet Classified:
American Farm Bureau Federation, American Petroleum Institute, American Road and Transportation Builders Association and others
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Michael S. Regan, In His Official Capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Intervenor:
Chickaloon Village Traditional Council, Rappahannock Tribe, Tohono O'Odham Nation and others
State of Iowa, et al v. EPA, et al
as 23-1144
Petitioner:
State of Iowa, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
State of Florida v. Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, et al
as 23-11644
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Defendant / Appellant:
SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CHIEF OF THE UNITED STATES BORDER PATROL and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Classified By Court:
THE STATE OF VIRGINIA, THE STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICANS FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE, CANIZARES LAW GROUP LLC, CATHOLIC CHARITIES LEGAL SERVICES and others
State of Florida v. USA, et al
as 23-11528
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and others
Amicus Curiae:
IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE, THE STATE OF VIRGINIA, AMERICANS FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE and others
Not Classified By Court:
THE STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA, THE STATE OF ARKANSAS and others
State of Washington, et al v. FDA, et al
as 23-35294
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF OREGON, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION, ROBERT M. CALIFF, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drugs, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF IOWA, STATE OF MONTANA and others
Robert Clayborne, Jr. v. State of Nebraska
as 23-1717
Petitioner:
Robert Earl Clayborne, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Nebraska
In Re: Subpoena Issued to Innovation Law Lab
as 6:2023cv00420
Plaintiff:
State of Arizona, State of Louisiana, State of Missouri and others
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, U S Dept of Justice, David Neal and others
Petitioner:
Innovation Law Lab
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
