Cases 41 - 50 of 515
Monroe et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00815
Plaintiff:
Monroe, Belton Monroe, Jessica Monroe and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Health Freedom Defense Fund, et al v. President of the United States, et al
as 22-11287
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HEALTH FREEDOM DEFENSE FUND, A Wyoming Not-for-Profit Corporation, ANA CAROLINA DAZA, An individual and SARAH POPE, An individual
Defendant / Appellant:
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL and others
Not Classified By Court:
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION and PUBLIC HEALTH AND PUBLIC HEALTH LAW EXPERTS
United States v. Paul Pope
as 22-1269
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Paul Ramon Pope
Stein v. R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company et al
as 1:2022cv00903
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company, John C. Pope, Irene M. Esteves and others
Ammah v. R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company et al
as 1:2022cv00577
Plaintiff:
Victor Ammah
Defendant:
R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company, John C. Pope, Irene M. Esteves and others
Jones v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
Brian Jones
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Cort L. O'Haver, Peggy Y. Fowler and others
Wilson v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Jordan Wilson
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Peggy Fowler, Stephen M. Gambee and others
CICCOTELLI v. UMPQUA HOLDINGS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv05610
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Defendant:
UMPQUA HOLDINGS CORPORATION, PEGGY YVONNE FLOWER, BRYAN L TIMM and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Mason v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10912
Plaintiff:
Richard Mason
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Peggy Y. Fowler, Cort Lane O'Haver and others
Kamp v. Pope
as 1:2021cv01039
Plaintiff:
Joseph F. Kamp
Defendant:
James Pope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
