Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Jackson v. STF Services Corp.
as 20-597
Defendant / Appellee:
STF Services Corporation, Michael R. Bloomberg, Bloomberg L.P. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jeffrey S. Jackson
Defendant:
John Doe, Bloomberg Industry Group and Bloomberg BNA
Juan Delgado v. Bloomberg L.P., et al
as 19-14214
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JUAN JOSE RENDON DELGADO
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL RILEY, JORDAN ROBERTSON, BLOOMBERG BUSINESSWEEK and others
Woolf v. Strada
as 19-860
Defendant / Appellee:
Mathew Asman, Individually, Andrew Bowyer, Individually, Melissa Strada, Individually and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald Woolf
Defendant:
Gary Kotovets
Nastasi & Associates, Inc. v. Bloomberg, L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv12361
Defendant:
Ronald Olson, Donaldson Acoustics, Co. Inc., Fay Devlin and others
Plaintiff:
Nastasi & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Roseman v. Bloomberg, L.P.
as 17-3195
Petitioner:
Bloomberg L.P.
Respondent:
Alexander Lee, Eric Michael Roseman, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and William Van Vleet
NORTH JERSEY MEDIA GROUP INC. et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2016cv00267
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , WILLIAM E. BARONI, JR. and BRIDGET ANNE KELLY
Movant:
NORTH JERSEY MEDIA GROUP INC. , BLOOMBERG L.P. , NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In re: WP Company LLC
as 15-1293
Petitioner:
NEWSPAPER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, FIRST LOOK MEDIA, INC., THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY and others
In Re: The Wall Street Journal
as 15-1179
Petitioner:
In re: THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS, THE CHARLESTON GAZETTE and others
Bloomberg L.P. v. Federal Communications Commi
as 13-3788
Petitioner:
Bloomberg, L.P.
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-1805
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
