Cases 41 - 50 of 125
Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations LLC v. The Coca-Cola Company
as 1:2018cv01313
Plaintiff:
Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC
Defendant:
The Coca-Cola Company
Respondent:
Plexus Corp
Ronald Sendejas v. Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv02203
Defendant:
Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc., Does, Catalina Gamino and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Sendejas
Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations LLC v. The Coca-Cola Company
as 1:2018mi00019
Plaintiff:
Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC
Defendant:
The Coca-Cola Company
Respondent:
Plexus Corp
Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations LLC v. The Coca-Cola Company
as 2:2018mc00008
Plaintiff:
Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations LLC
Defendant:
The Coca-Cola Company
Respondent:
Plexus Corp
Jason Gardner v. BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles et al
as 8:2017cv01936
Defendant:
BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles, Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc., Does and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Gardner
Unknown:
Pamela A Triplett
Samuel Armenta et al v. The Coca Cola Company et al
as 2:2017cv07312
Plaintiff:
Samuel Armenta and Walter Lopez
Defendant:
BCI Coca Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles, DOES and The Coca Cola Company
Sonia Knoblach v. The Coca Cola Company et al
as 2:2017cv06672
Defendant:
DOES, Nexstep Beverages, LLC and The Coca Cola Company
Plaintiff:
Sonia Knoblach
COCA COLA COMPANY & SUBSIDIARIES v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 1:2017cv00393
Plaintiff:
COCA COLA COMPANY & SUBSIDIARIES
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
COCA COLA COMPANY & SUBSIDIARIES v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 1:2017cv00134
Plaintiff:
COCA COLA COMPANY & SUBSIDIARIES
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Yoshonis v. The Coca-Cola Company
as 2:2016cv13217
Defendant:
The Coca-Cola Company
Plaintiff:
Michael Yoshonis
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
