Cases 41 - 50 of 131
Bank of Hope v. Continental Casualty Company
as 2:2018cv02275
Plaintiff:
Bank of Hope
Defendant:
Continental Casualty Company
Alan Carrico v. CNA Insurance et al
as 2:2018cv01445
Defendant:
Eric Anderson, CNA, CNA Central and others
Plaintiff:
Alan Carrico
Maria Jordan, et al v. DOWCP, et al
as 17-60851
Petitioner:
MARIA JORDAN and JACK JORDAN
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL, L.L.C. and CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY
Taylor v. Continental Casualty Company
as 1:2017cv04506
Plaintiff:
Rose M. Taylor
Defendant:
Continental Casualty Company
Alan Lucien Cerf v. Continental Casualty Company
as 2:2017cv07993
Plaintiff:
Alan Lucien Cerf
Defendant:
Continental Casualty Company
Charles Levy v. Continental Casualty Company, et al
as 17-56589
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES M. LEVY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON, including Syndicate Number 3624, HISCOX, INC. and CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY
Pet Sit Pros Long Beach LLC et al v. Continental Casualty Company
as 2:2017cv07460
Defendant:
Continental Casualty Company and Does
Plaintiff:
Fernando Goldfischer, Jason Goldfischer and Pet Sit Pros Long Beach LLC
Employers Insurance Company of Wausau v. Continental Casualty Company
as 1:2017cv06273
Petitioner:
Employers Insurance Company of Wausau
Respondent:
Continental Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Maria Jordan v. DOWCP, et al
as 17-60424
Petitioner:
MARIA JORDAN
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL, L.L.C. and CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY
In re: W.R. Grace & Co., et al
as 17-1208
Debtor - Appellee:
In the Matter of: WR GRACE & CO
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO and TRANSPORTATION INSURANCE CO
Defendant - Appellant:
JEREMY B. CARR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
