Cases 41 - 50 of 1,201
PHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY et al v. BUTTIGIEG et al
as 1:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
PHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, PHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY/COLORADO, ROCKY MOUNTAIN PEACE & JUSTICE CENTER and others
Defendant:
PETE BUTTIGIEG, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Mulgrew et al v. United States Department of Transportation et al
as 1:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MULGREW, AFL-CIO, Vito J. Fossella and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Shailen Bhatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
State of Texas et al v. U.S. Department of Transportation et al
as 5:2023cv00304
Plaintiff:
State of Texas and Texas Department of Transportation
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Shailen Bhatt and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Road and Transportation Builders Association and Associated General Contractors of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Commonwealth of Kentucky et al v. Federal Highway Administration et al
as 5:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, State of South Dakota, State of Alabama and others
Defendant:
Federal Highway Administration, Shailen Bhatt, U.S. Department of Transportation and others
Interested Party:
The American Road and Transportation Builders Association and The Associated General Contractors of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
United States of America, et al. v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Eugene, et al.
as 24-684
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRISTY GOLDFUSS, in her official capacity as Director of Council on Environmental Quality, SHAUN DONOVAN, in his official capacity as Director of the Office of Management and Budget and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, EUGENE
Defendant:
STATE OF ALABAMA
Not Classified By Court:
XIUHTEZCATL TONATIUH M., through his Guardian Tamara Roske-Martinez, ALEXANDER LOZNAK, JACOB LEBEL and others
Intervenor:
THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, AMERICAN FUEL & PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Salt Lake City Corporation et al v. Shepherd et al
as 2:2023cv00893
Plaintiff:
Salt Lake City Corporation, Sandy City Corporation and Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake and Sandy
Defendant:
Gloria M. Shepherd, Ivan Marrero, Federal Highway Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Rowlands et al v. US Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 1:2023cv01567
Petitioner:
Sylvia Rowlands, Phillip Rowlands, Daniel Maier and others
Respondent:
US Army Corps of Engineers, US Maritime Administration Department, NYS Department of Environmental Conservation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Citizens' Committee To Save Our Canyons v. Braceras et al
as 2:2023cv00894
Plaintiff:
Citizens Committee To Save Our Canyons and Citizens' Committee To Save Our Canyons
Defendant:
Carlos Braceras, Utah Department of Transportation, Randy Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Chan et al v. United States Department of Transportation et al
as 1:2023cv10365
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Chan, Tamara Hoffman and Does 1 through 200
Defendant:
United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Shailen Bhatt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Motley v. Janae Rocquel Motley Estate
as 24-1
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANAE ROCQUEL MOTLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
JANAE ROCQUEL MOTLEY ESTATE, beneficiary JANAE ROCQUEL MOTLEY, DYMARION RASHAD BROOKS ESTATE, beneficiary DYMARION RASHAD BROOKS, DERRION RASHAD BROOKS ESTATE, beneficiary DERRION RASHAD BROOKS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
