Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Duquesne Light Company v. FERC
as 08-1350
Petitioner: Duquesne Light Company
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: FirstEnergy Service Company, Duquesne Industrial Intervenors, Duke Energy Corporation and others
Natl' Rural Elec. Coop Assoc. v. FERC
as 08-1278
Petitioner: National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, Transmission Dependent Utility Systems and East Texas Electric Cooperative, Inc.
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: Edison Electric Institute, Entergy Services, Inc., New York Independent System Operator, Inc. and others
Richard Blumenthal v. FERC
as 08-1216
Petitioner: Richard Blumenthal, Attorney General for the State of Connecticut, Lisa Madigan, Attorney General of the State of Illinois and Patrick Lynch, Attorney General of the State of Rhode Island
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor For Petitioner: American Public Power Association, Coalition of Midwest Transmission Customers, Deseret Generation & Transmission Co-operative, Inc. and others
Intervenor For Respondent: Duke Energy Corporation, Lower Mount Bethel Energy, LLC, PPL Brunner Island, LLC and others
American Public Power Associat v. FERC
as 08-1077
Petitioner: American Public Power Association, National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, Transmission Access Policy Study Group and others
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: California Independent System Operator Corporation, Duke Energy Corporation, Edison Electric Institute and others
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner: East Texas Electric Cooperative, Inc., Northeast Texas Electric Cooperative, Inc., Sam Rayburn G&T Electric Cooperative, Inc. and others
E ON US v. FERC
as 08-1079
Petitioner: E.ON U.S. LLC
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner: Duke Energy Corporation
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: Edison Electric Institute and New York Independent System Operator, Incorporated
Arandell Corp. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv01019
Plaintiff: Arandell Corp., Arandell Corp., Arandell Corp. and others
Defendant: Xcel Energy Inc., Xcel Energy Inc., Northern States Power Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Heartland Regional Medical Center et al v. Oneok, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv00987
Plaintiff: Heartland Regional Medical Center, Heartland Regional Medical Center, Heartland Regional Medical Center and others
Defendant: Oneok, Inc., Oneok Energy Marketing & Trading Company, LP, Kansas Gas Marketing Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Heartland Regional Medical Center et al v. Oneok, Inc. et al
as 5:2007cv06048
Plaintiff: Heartland Regional Medical Center, Heartland Regional Medical Center, Heartland Regional Medical Center and others
Defendant: Oneok, Inc., Oneok Energy Marketing and Trading Company, L.P., Kansas Gas Marketing Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Amer Radio Relay v. FCC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 06-1343
Petitioner: American Radio Relay League, Incorporated
Respondent: Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor: CURRENT Technologies, LLC, Duke Energy Corporation, Utilities Telecom Council and others
Intervenor For Petitioner: National Association of Broadcasters and Association for Maximum Service Television, Inc.
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO V US We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 04-5122
Amicus Curiae: AEP TEXAS CENTRAL COMPANY, ALABAMA POWER COMPANY, CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff-Appellant: INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO.
Appellee: UNITED STATES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?