Cases 41 - 50 of 187
Gamboa v. Lumpkin
as 21-20236
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jesse Celedon Gamboa
Defendant / Appellee:
Debra Gibbs, Chair and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Jeffrey Wren v. Martin Gamboa
as 21-70949
Respondent:
MARTIN GAMBOA, Warden
Petitioner:
JEFFREY CHARLES WREN
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2021cv01248
Plaintiff:
David Gamboa and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
XTO Energy, Inc.
Gamboa Olmos v. Garland
as 21-60315
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
Venancio Gamboa Olmos
United States of America v. Velasquez (Mason)
as 21-546
Defendant:
Christopher Kittrell, AKA Frog, Lincoln Godoy, Mario Rodriguez and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Irving Mason, AKA Spidey
Gamboa-Salazar v. Garland
as 21-6106
Petitioner:
EDI GAMBOA-SALAZAR
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and ROBERT M. WILKINSON, ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jeffrey Wren v. Martin Gamboa
as 21-70050
Respondent:
MARTIN GAMBOA, Warden
Petitioner:
JEFFREY CHARLES WREN
Jose Morales v. R. Torres, et al
as 21-15029
Defendant / Appellee:
GAMBOA, ALVARADO-TORRES and R. TORRES
Defendant:
JONATHAN E. AKANNO, LAMBERT, DAVE DAVEY, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE LORENZO MORALES
Fruits-Giddings S.A. de C.V. et al v. Always Fresh Farms, LLC et al
as 8:2020cv02875
Defendant:
Wayne Giddings, Matthew Giddings and Always Fresh Farms, LLC
Plaintiff:
Giddings Berries Chile S.A., Giddings Berries Peru S.A.C. and Fruits-Giddings S.A. de C.V.
Counter Defendant:
Patricio Cortes, Giddings Fruit, S.A., Giddings Fruit USA LLC and others
Not Classified By Court:
Christopher Lee Griffin
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. ยง 0499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Enrique Diaz v. Roger Martinez, et al
as 20-17097
Defendant / Appellee:
ROGER MARTINEZ, R. GAMBOA and R. DOWNEY, Jr., Lietenant
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ENRIQUE DIAZ, AKA Yosef E. Diaz-Shevatz
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
