Cases 41 - 50 of 1,107
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Sotelo
as 4:2023cv03792
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. as Broadcast Licensee of the Ramirez v. Lopez Fight Program doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
Melani Monserrat Sotelo doing business as El Rolis Bites doing business as El Rolis Bites Ice Cream & Snacks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Jasi v. U.S. Citizen and Immigration Services (USCIS) et al
as 8:2023cv02702
Plaintiff:
KAREN JOHANNA JASI and Karen Johana Jasi
Defendant:
USCIS, ICE, EOIR and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Otto Candies, LLC, et al v. Citigroup Inc.
as 23-13152
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OTTO CANDIES, LLC, CANDIES MEXICAN INVESTMENTS S. DE R.L. DE C.V., ASHMORE EMERGING MARKETS CORPORATE HIGH YIELD FUND LIMITED and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITIGROUP INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bourn v. IC System, Inc.
as 2:2023cv14273
Plaintiff:
Blondena Bourn
Defendant:
IC System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00715
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv81123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
