Cases 41 - 50 of 928
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
J.D. Irving, Limited v. United States et al
as 1:2022cv00256
Plaintiff:
J.D. Irving, Limited
Defendant:
United States, U.S. Department of Commerce and United States Department of Commerce
Boston Retirement System, et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al
as 22-80076
Respondent:
BOSTON RETIREMENT SYSTEM, DAVID MESSINGER, ELLIE MARIE TORONTO ESA and others
Petitioner:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., DARA KHOSROWSHAHI, NELSON CHAI and others
Bushansky v. Prologis, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv04320
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
Prologis, Inc., Hamid R. Moghadam, Irving F. Lyons, III and others
Stevanus Edward v. Former President Trump et al
as 5:2022cv01066
Plaintiff:
Stevanus Edward
Defendant:
Former President Trump, Trump Administration, Former Prsident Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Clervrain et al v. Ebert et al
as 3:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Emmanuel Benjoassaint, Kaity Borgella and others
Defendant:
Jhone Ebert, Charles Daniels, Ann Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Portillo Acuna v. Garland
as 22-612
Petitioner:
WALTER IRVING PORTILLO ACUNA, N. I. P. S. and C. I. S. P.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Acosta et al v. Clearstream Banking S.A
as 1:2022cv01655
Plaintiff:
CARLOS ACOSTA, ELIZABETH RICH, LIBBY KAHANE and others
Defendant:
CLEARSTREAM BANKING S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ej Fed. Question: Enforcement of Judgment
Pickering v. Irving
as 6:2022cv00282
Plaintiff:
Joshua Pickering
Defendant:
Christina R Irving
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
