Cases 41 - 50 of 800
Doe v. GoodRx Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00744
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
GoodRx Holdings, Inc., Criteo Corp., Meta Platforms, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
John Doe v. Grindr Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02093
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Grindr Inc. and Grindr LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Caleb L. McGillvary et al v. Netflix, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01195
Plaintiff:
Caleb L. McGillvary
Defendant:
Netflix, Inc., Bunim Murray Productions, Jimmy Kimmel Live and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Tan v. Quick Box, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv01082
Defendant:
Health & Body Care TN, Inc., Skin Beauty & Health JN, Inc., EW Radiant Skin Store, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Vibrant Face & Beauty Shop ATN, Inc., Diet and Beauty Enterprise JB, Inc., Beautiful Skin and Health SL, Inc. and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Chad Biggins, Stephen Adele and Konnektive Corporation
Cross Claimant:
Matthew Martorano, James Martell, Kathryn Martorano and others
Plaintiff:
LeAnne Tan
3Rd Party Defendant:
Rocket Management Group, LLC and Kiet Liu
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Consumer 2.0, Inc. v. Fu, et al.
as 1:2023mc00031
Plaintiff:
Consumer 2.0, Inc.
Defendant:
Tonny Fu, Tonny Vu and John Doe
Consumer 2.0, Inc. v. Fu et al
as 3:2023mc80111
Plaintiff:
Consumer 2.0, Inc.
Defendant:
Tonny Fu, Tonny Vu and John Doe
Dyer v. DOES 1-10
as 3:2023cv01226
Plaintiff:
Min Ji Goo Dyer
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pars Equality Center et al v. Pompeo et al
as 3:2018cv07818
Defendant:
U.S Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security, Mike Pompeo and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe # 1, Nicholas Hanout, Afshin Raghebi and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Shane Scofield v. National Tax Advisory Services LLC et al
as 2:2022cv06931
Plaintiff:
Shane Scofield
Defendant:
National Tax Advisory Services LLC a California limited liability company doing business as Action Tax Group and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
