Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 111
Gez Agolli v. CA Progressive Medical Centers, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv04665
Plaintiff: Gez Agolli
Defendant: Kevin Banion, David C. Bianconi, Tim Boylan and others
Martin v. Tax Appeal Business System, Inc. et al
as 1:2017mc20089
Plaintiff: Nicholas M. Martin
Defendant: Tax Appeal Business System, Inc. and George Vallejo
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2016cv00147
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv02852
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Martin v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA
as 1:2016cv09483
Plaintiff: Nicholas M Martin
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Strougo v. Barclays PLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1912
Plaintiff - Appellee: Joseph Waggoner, Mohit Sahni and Barbara Strougo, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant: Chris Lucas, Tushar Morzaria and Bob Diamond
Defendant - Appellant: Barclays PLC, Robert Diamond, Antony Jenkins and others
Amicus Curiae: Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Paul A. Atkins, Elizabeth Cosenza and others
In re: James Martin
as 16-12718
Petitioner: In re: JAMES M. MARTIN
Successive Habeas Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
In re: James Martin
as 15-14937
Petitioner: In re: JAMES M. MARTIN
Successive Habeas Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
IN RE: SUBPOENA
as 1:2015mc01002
Plaintiff: KEVIN M. MARTIN
Defendant: KARL RACINE and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Martin v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as WVS/2:14-cv-30089
Plaintiff: Joanne M. Martin
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?