Cases 41 - 50 of 347
Rafael Medrano-Ruiz v. Merrick Garland
as 21-70826
Petitioner:
RAFAEL ANTONIO MEDRANO-RUIZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Albert Smith v. Charles Ryan, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 21-15532
Defendant / Appellee:
REYNA, SSU Coordinator/ Lt., J. CHAVEZ, SSU Sgt., ARNOLDO MEDRANO, SSU Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT VAUGHN SMITH
USA v. Vazquez-Medrano
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 21-10250
Defendant / Appellant:
Jorge Ivan Vazquez-Medrano
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Maria Medrano-Portillo v. Merrick Garland
as 21-1241
Petitioner:
MARIA ISABEL MEDRANO-PORTILLO and CARLOS ALBERTO MEDRANO-MARQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General and ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Attorney General
US v. Miguel Medrano-Ramos
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 21-4097
Defendant / Appellant:
MIGUEL ANGEL MEDRANO-RAMOS, a/k/a Miguel A. Medrano-Ramos, a/k/a Miguel Medrano-Ramos, a/k/a Miguel Angel Ramos, a/k/a Miguel T. Medrano, a/k/a Miguel Hector Medrano, a/k/a Miguel Medrano
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Melvin Gomez-Medrano v. Robert Wilkinson
as 21-1193
Petitioner:
MELVIN GEANCARLOS GOMEZ-MEDRANO and J.A.G.
Respondent:
ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Attorney General
Salgado-Medrano v. Garland
as 20-3997
Petitioner:
ERICKA LISSETH SALGADO-MEDRANO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Teofilo Santana Medrano
as 20-14189
Defendant / Appellant:
TEOFILO CARLOS SANTANA MEDRANO
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ramon Medrano, et al v. William Barr
as 20-72999
Petitioner:
RAMON EDUARDO MEDRANO and JOSE EDUARDO MEDRANO-ALFARO
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.