Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv04451
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Collins
as 2:2009mc51371
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael Lee Collins
Garnishee:
Credit Union of Johnson County
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Michael Collins v. Committee for Purchase from Pe, et al
as 09-5835
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL E. COLLINS
Defendant - Appellant:
COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED, TERESA LASSETER, Farm Services Agency-USDA, FARM SERVICES AGENCY-USDA and others
Collins v. Committee for Purchase from People who are Blind or Severely Disabled et al
as 2:2009cv00068
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Collins, Michael E. Collins and Michael E. Collins
Defendant:
Committee for Purchase from People who are Blind or Severely Disabled, Teresa Lasseter, Teresa Lasseter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 (c)(1) Findings, Concl. & Proposed Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Michael Edward Collins, et al. v. Aqua-Chem, Inc., et al.
as NCW/1:08-CV-00068
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Collins
Michael S. Collins, et al. v. Aqua-Chem, Inc., et al.
as NCW/1:05-CV-00376
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Collins
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
