Cases 41 - 50 of 120
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00211
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03542
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Robert Dougherty v. Dana Lawhorne
as 19-7835
Defendant / Appellee:
T. L. CRICKEMBERGER, Hearing Officer (of record), Coffewood Correctional Center, M.S. KIMBERLY TUCKER, Grievance Officer, Coffewood Correctional Center, WENDY S. HOBBS, Regional Administrator Grievances, Virginia Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. DOUGHERTY
Mavis Ward v. Ronald Coleman-Ward, et al
as 19-6156
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE, TROY BUTTREY, FIRST BANK, aka FB and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAVIS WARD
W. Todd Newcomb v. Wyndham Vacation Ownership, et al
as 19-3109
Defendant / Appellee:
Wheeler Services, LLC, Shutts & Bowen, LLP and Wyndham Vacation Ownership, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
W. Todd Newcomb
Darnell Rush v. Sheri Newcomb
as 19-2013
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SHERI L. NEWCOMB
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARNELL RUSH
Robert Dougherty v. Dana Lawhorne
as 19-6964
Defendant / Appellee:
T. L. CRICKEMBERGER, Hearing Officer (of record), Coffewood Correctional Center, M.S. KIMBERLY TUCKER, Grievance Officer, Coffewood Correctional Center, WENDY S. HOBBS, Regional Administrator Grievances, Virginia Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. DOUGHERTY
Jaramillo et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11354
Plaintiff:
Joseph Necaise, Leland Miller, Paul Connolly and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, Robert Bosch GmbH and Robert Bosch LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
