Cases 41 - 50 of 4,247
Coleman, et al. v. Newsom, et al.
as 24-3707
Plaintiff:
RALPH COLEMAN, JORGE ANDRADE RICO, PETER COCKCROFT and others
Defendant:
GAVIN NEWSOM, JEFF MACOMBER, JOE STEPHENSHAW and others
Ralph Evans v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 24-11882
Petitioner:
RALPH G. EVANS
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Diane Williams, et al
as 24-11770
Defendant:
RALPH A. WILLIAMS, TASTEMAKERS ELITE LLC and DIANE WILLIAMS
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
William Allen v. Blackbaud, Inc.
as 24-180
Petitioner:
WILLIAM ALLEN, KATHLEEN ARMAN, WILLIAM CARPANELLA and others
Respondent:
BLACKBAUD, INC., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation MDL 2972
Ayers v. iRhythm Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00593
Defendant:
Renee Budig, Quentin Blackford, Douglas J. Devine and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ayers
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Rhodes v. Ford
as 24-3106
Plaintiff:
KAVIN MAURICE RHODES
Defendant:
D. FORD, LTA, D. LUNSFORD, SSA, K. ROYAL and others
Susan Seltzer v. Michael Lieder, et al
as 24-7071
Plaintiff:
Susan Seltzer
Defendant:
Michael David Lieder, Ameriprise, formerly known as American Express Financial Advisors, Inc., Edward B. Magarian and others
Alexander v. Diaz, et al.
as 24-2942
Plaintiff:
ANAND JON ALEXANDER
Defendant:
RALPH DIAZ, Secretary of CDCR, MARCUS POLLARD, Warden, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility, DANIEL PARAMO, former Warden, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility and others
Coleman, et al. v. Newsom, et al.
as 24-2938
Plaintiff:
RALPH COLEMAN, JORGE ANDRADE RICO, PETER COCKCROFT and others
Defendant:
GAVIN NEWSOM, JEFF MACOMBER, JOE STEPHENSHAW and others
Federal Trade Commission v. BlueSnap, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01898
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
BlueSnap, Inc., BlueSnap Payment Services LTD, Ralph Dangelmaier and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 6101 Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
