Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 2,138
Jerry VanDiverIn re: Jerry VanDiver
as 23-2000
Petitioner: In re: JERRY RICK VANDIVER
Respondent: KIM CARGOR, Warden
USA v. Ransom Robinson
as 23-1994
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: RANSOM TAE-RICK ROBINSON
Haynes, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 23-3327
Plaintiff: CHERYL COTTERILL
Defendant / Appellee: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Defendant: MATHEW MASON, HUGH HALL, GREGORY HICKS and others
Not Yet Classified: GREGORY MELVIN HAYNES, ATTORNEY, counsel for plaintiff
Navient Solutions, LLC v. Jeffrey Lohman
as 23-2163
Plaintiff / Appellee: NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC
Defendant / Appellant: JEFFREY LOHMAN and LAW OFFICES OF JEFFREY LOHMAN, A Professional Corporation
Defendant: JEREMY BRANCH, CHAMPION MARKETING SOLUTIONS, LLC, d/b/a CMS, JOHN DOES 1-20 and others
Joseph v. Hill, et al.
as 23-3133
Petitioner / Appellant: JAMES JOSEPH
Respondent / Appellee: RICK HILL
Respondent: PEOPLE OF CALIFORNIA
Wesley RicksIn re: Wesley Ricks
as 23-30753
Petitioner: In re: Wesley Ricks
Navient Solutions, LLC v. Jeffrey Lohman
as 23-2109
Plaintiff / Appellant: NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC
Defendant / Appellee: JEFFREY LOHMAN, JEREMY BRANCH, CHAMPION MARKETING SOLUTIONS, LLC, d/b/a CMS and others
Defendant: DAVID MIZE, IBRAHIM MUHTASEB, ALYSON DYKES and others
Kelly v. Pioneer Merger Corp. et al
as 3:2023mc80273
Plaintiff: James Kelly
Defendant: Pioneer Merger Corp., Pioneer Merger Sponsor LLC, Jonathan Christodoro and others
Lavanga v. Avantax, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv09159
Plaintiff: Vincent Lavanga
Defendant: Avantax, Inc., Georganne Proctor, Mark Ernst and others
US v. Charles Burke
as 23-6994
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: CHARLES RICHARD BURKE, a/k/a Rick, a/k/a D, a/k/a Detroit Rick, a/k/a Hasim Coleman, a/k/a Rick Calloway, a/k/a Jihad Alexander

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?