Cases 41 - 50 of 6,059
Turner v. Rogers
as 24-2273
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY R. TURNER and Anthony Richardo Turner
Defendant:
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, DISTRICT JUDGE, US District Court Judge
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Misuraca v. Loke, et al.
as 24-2219
Defendant:
AMY BRAEUNINGER, DON at W.C.J, JAMIE LOKE, Corrections Officer at Washington County jail (W.C.J.), HARMONY JONES, Corrections Officer at W.C.J. and others
Plaintiff:
AIRIAN JOVAN MISURACA
Ader v. NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01759
Plaintiff:
Ali Ader
Defendant:
NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., William J. Rieflin, David V. Goeddel and others
White, Jr. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
as 9:2024mc80360
Plaintiff:
Thomas Roger White, Jr.
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Rogers v. Weaver, et al.
as 24-2097
Plaintiff:
RAY CLARENCE ROGERS
Defendant:
WEAVER, Sgt/Supervisor Officer, King County Correctional Facility, KING COUNTY - STATE OF WASHINGTON, Owner of King County Correctional Facility, ALLEN NANCE, Director, King County Correctional Facility and others
Rogers v. Pfeiffer
as 24-2037
Petitioner:
SPENCER EARL ROGERS
Respondent:
CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Warden
ROGERS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00492
Petitioner:
APRIL ROGERS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Molina-Escobar, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1919
Petitioner:
ROGER ADOLFO MOLINA-ESCOBAR, ELISA MORALES-ALVARADO, EMELY MICHELLE MOLINA-MORALES and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Richards v. Centripetal Networks, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01065
Plaintiff:
Albert Richards
Defendant:
Centripetal Networks, Inc., Alsop Louie Partners LLC, Houlihan Lokey, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
