Cases 41 - 50 of 130
USA v. Kennon Searcy
as 19-40535
Defendant / Appellant:
KENNON DUTWAIN SEARCY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Searcy
as 19-117
Petitioner:
In re: ANDREW SEARCY, JR.
Respondent:
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD
SEARCY v. SMITH et al
as 1:2019cv00921
Defendant:
MICHAEL P. SAWICKI, DEMAURICE F. SMITH, PROMETRIC and others
Plaintiff:
HENRY SEARCY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
White Operating Company et al v. Bank of America NA et al
as 3:2019cv00818
Counter Defendant:
Connect Transport, LLC
Undetermined:
Case Admin Support and Harlin D Hale
Cross Defendant:
Bankof America, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Hilcorp Energy Development LP, Devon Energy Production Company, LP, White Operating Company and others
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., Jason R. Searcy and Jason R Searcy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Faye Searcy, et al v. CitiMortgage, Incorporated
as 19-10341
Defendant / Appellee:
CITIMORTGAGE, INCORPORATED
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BOBBY C. SEARCY and FAYE M. SEARCY
Delbert Rogers v. Peter Caswell, et al
as 19-10299
Defendant / Appellee:
KRISTIAN LUERA, M.A., LPC-Intern, ASOTP, PETER CASWELL, Case Manager, MICHAEL SEARCY, Operation Specialist and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DELBERT GLENN ROGERS
Ronald Searcy v. Prison Rehab Industries & ENT,, et al
as 19-10148
Defendant / Appellee:
PRISON REHAB INDUSTRIES & ENT, INC., SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, S. WALKER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SEARCY
Gregory Searcy v. Travelers Property and Casualty Company of America
as 2:2018cv00042
Defendant:
DOES and Travelers Property and Casualty Company of America
Plaintiff:
Gregory Searcy
Katileo Searcy v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv05445
Defendant:
Does and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Katileo Searcy
USA v. Corey Searcy
as 17-2101
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
COREY D. SEARCY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
