Cases 41 - 50 of 1,308
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05813
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting
Shaw v. United Parcel Service Inc et al
as 3:2023cv01996
Plaintiff:
Van Shaw
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc and Rene G. Acosta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Capital Power Corporation, et al v. FERC
as 23-1231
Petitioner:
Capital Power Corporation, D. E. Shaw Renewable Investments, L.L.C., EDP Renewables North America LLC and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
SHAW v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01502
Petitioner:
LINDA SHAW
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Murphy v. Argo Blockchain plc et al
as 1:2023cv07305
Lead Plaintiff:
Richard Hawes
Plaintiff:
Aaron Murphy
Petitioner:
Brian Begay, Benjamin Lamontagne, Ever Garcia and others
Defendant:
Argo Blockchain plc, Peter Wall, Alex Appleton and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP v. SC SJ Holdings LLC
as 5:2023mc80209
Plaintiff:
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Defendant:
SC SJ Holdings LLC
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP v. FMT SJ LLC
as 5:2023mc80208
Plaintiff:
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Defendant:
FMT SJ LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00826
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
