Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 74
Global Crossing Local Services, Inc. v. Kansas Corporation Commission, The et al
as 2:2011cv02195
Plaintiff: Global Crossing Local Services, Inc.
Defendant: Kansas Corporation Commission, The , Thomas Wright , Ward Lloyd and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151
Global Crossing Local Services, Inc. v. The Missouri Public Service Commission et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2011cv00315
Plaintiff: Global Crossing Local Services, Inc.
Defendant: The Missouri Public Service Commission , Kevin Gunn , Robert M. Clayton, III and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
as 3:2010cv01642
Plaintiff: Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
Defendant: Touch-Tel USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Next-G Communication Inc
as 3:2010cv01498
Plaintiff: Southwestern Bell Telephone Company and Bell South Telecommunications, Inc.
Defendant: Next-G Communication Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hancock et al v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company Inc et al
as 5:2010cv00822
Plaintiff: Gayen Hancock , David Cross , Montez Mutzig and others
Defendant: American Telephone and Telegraph Company Inc, AT&T Operations Inc, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company LP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company v. Sprint Spectrum, L.P. et al
as 4:2010cv04093
Plaintiff: Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
Defendant: Sprint Spectrum, L.P., Nextel of Texas, Inc. and Nextel South Corp.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 251
AU Optronics Corporation, et al v. USDCSF, et al
as 10-71745
: In re: AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA
Petitioner: AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA
Respondent: USDC, SAN FRANCISCO
Defendant: EPSON ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Real Party In Interest: CHI MEI INNOLUX, NEXGEN MEDIATECH USA, INC., HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION and others
Motorola, Inc., et al v. Hannstar Display Corporation, et al
as 10-16215
In Re: In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff: MOTOROLA, INC., AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, AT&T CORPORATION and others
Intervenor: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor - Appellee: STATE OF ILLINOIS and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant: HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION
Defendant: AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, CHI MEI INNOLUX and others
Motorola, Inc., et al v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al
as 10-16182
In Re: In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff: MOTOROLA, INC., AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, AT&T CORPORATION and others
Intervenor: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor - Appellee: STATE OF ILLINOIS and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant: AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA
Defendant: CHI MEI INNOLUX, NEXGEN MEDIATECH USA, INC., CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD and others
Midland Pizza, LLC et al v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv02219
Plaintiff: Midland Pizza, LLC , Pflumm & College Pizza, LLC and Prairie Village Pizza, LLC
Defendant: Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, AT&T Inc. and AT&T Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?