Cases 41 - 50 of 77
City of Huntington Beach v. FCC, et al
as 19-70146
Intervenor:
CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Nevada, CITY OF BELLEVUE, Washington, CITY OF YUMA, Arizona and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Petitioner:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
Amicus Curiae:
MISSOURI BASIN MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY, BERKSHIRE-LITCHFIELD ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL, IOWA ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPAL UTILITIES, MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL UTILITIES ASSOCIATION, MISSOURI ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPAL UTILITIES, AND ARKANSAS MUNICIPAL POWER ASSOCIATION and others
City of San Jose, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-70144
Petitioner:
CITY OF ARCADIA, Calfornia, CITY OF MONTEREY, California, CITY OF PIEDMONT, California and others
Intervenor:
COMPETITIVE CARRIERS ASSOCIATION, VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., CTIA - THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
City of Seattle, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-70136
Intervenor:
CITY OF BELLEVUE, Washington, CITY OF LACEY, Washington, CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Nevada and others
Petitioner:
LEAGUE OF OREGON CITIES, CITY OF SEATTLE, Washington, LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Sprint Corporation v. FCC, et al
as 19-70123
Intervenor:
CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Nevada, CITY OF YUMA, Arizona, CITY OF ISSAQUAH, Washington and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Petitioner:
SPRINT CORPORATION
Puerto Rico Telephone Company, v. FCC, et al
as 19-70125
Intervenor:
CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Nevada, CITY OF YUMA, Arizona, CITY OF ISSAQUAH, Washington and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Petitioner:
PUERTO RICO TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC.
Verizon Communications, Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 19-70124
Intervenor:
CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Nevada, CITY OF YUMA, Arizona, CITY OF ISSAQUAH, Washington and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Petitioner:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
City of Portland et al v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 1:2018op46140
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jay County and City of Portland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Portland City of et al v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 1:2018cv00290
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, PURDUE PHARMA L.P., MALLINCKRODT LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CITY OF PORTLAND and JAY COUNTY, Portland City of and Jay County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dennis Underwood v. USDC-ORPEN
as 18-71697
:
In re: DENNIS BURTON UNDERWOOD
Petitioner:
DENNIS BURTON UNDERWOOD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, PENDLETON
Real Party In Interest:
WILLIAM WALSH, JEFF AUXIER, JERRY BRIAN HODSON, in capacity as Judge and others
City of Portland, Oregon v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv00817
Defendant:
Actavis LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., Allergan PLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of Portland, Oregon
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
