Cases 41 - 50 of 207
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00738
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00720
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Castleberry v. Baylor Scott & White et al
as 4:2020cv00545
Plaintiff:
Rachel Castleberry
Defendant:
Diversified HealthCare Services, Inc., Baylor Scott & White and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00581
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00614
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00575
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
NE OH Neighborhood Health Serv, et al v. Travelers Casualty and Surety
as 20-3667
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COMMUNITY INTEGRATED SERVICES, INC. and NORTHEAST OHIO NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH SERVICES, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America v. Peek et al
as 2:2020mc00030
Plaintiff:
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Defendant:
Michael L Peek and Brenda Lee Peek
Garnishee:
Morris-Shea Bridge Company Incorporated
Hoover v. Santa Fe Ranch Ltd et al
as 3:2020cv01626
Defendant:
Santa Fe Ranch Ltd dba Santa Fe Ranch, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, Innovative Recovery, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Hoover and Philip Hoover
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
